Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Proposed Bylaw Change


Woodlawn

Status: Offline
Posts: 355
Date:
Proposed Bylaw Change
Permalink   


Article IV

It now reads

A) Active Member

Proposed Change to read

A) Active Member who answers First Aid Calls, Fire Calls and Trainings.

 

B) It says now Exempt or Social member with at least 5 years of service.

Proposed Change

B) Life, Exempt, Social, or Associate Member with at least 5 years of Active service (see Article IV sec A)

 

We will be voting on these changes at the July 30th meeting.



__________________


North Collins

Status: Offline
Posts: 420
Date:
Permalink   

Changing rules and bi-laws mid season is complete bush league, if this passes it should be for next season.

__________________
North Collins Softball, win or lose, we drink the booze


Newbie

Status: Offline
Posts: 3
Date:
Permalink   

Forgetting the fact that this rule seems so flimsy in it's ability to be enforced, not to mention how easy it is to get around, if the board thinks a rule change needs to be made to discourage this, then fine. So be it. But you have to be kidding me, right? Changing a rule mid season, regardless of its intention, is ridiculous. And does this mean guys who have been in the league as non-responding firemen for say 4 years, are no longer eligible to play all of a sudden?? And what passes as a responding fireman? "Well this guy hasn't gotten FF-1 yet, and hasn't made it to a call in 9 months, but he did come to that training that one time...so he intends on being active." I don't need to go in to specific names here, but I know for a fact that there are "non-responding" firemen that do a heck of a whole lot more for their company than some "responding" ones. 

I personally think that participation in a fire company with any amount of dedication is a good thing, and if being able to play softball gets a guy there then thats fine. It should be on the individual fire companies to take a hard look at their own by laws and determine if their members are worthy enough to play based on their contributions. 

I get the angle and reasoning. But if you are making the rule you have to grandfather in everyone playing right now, and it has to go into affect at the start of the next season. The only instance in which a rule should be changed mid season is if it is a unanimous yes. 



__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard